I took the train to Paris last weekend, fully conscious that before too long, such a journey will cost more than $23 and take longer than 2 hours.When a friend asked me about my plans for Paris, I listed the following activities: visit English-language bookstores, watch the Six Nations Rugby tournament in an Irish pub, dine at Breakfast in America, enjoy some Chinese food and/or sushi, and visit the Musee D'Orsay. The friend suggested that I was looking for a very American weekend, and suggested I find more Parisian pursuits.
Yes, well, Paris is fine, I replied, but I'm longing for home, and Paris offers more Americana than any other place I can get to by train, so there... And plus, I am planning to visit the Musee D'Orsay. So there, again...
It was a great weekend -- in the words of our Commander-in-Chief: mission accomplished. Bought three new books, watched two and a half rugby matches, shared pitchers of beer with a party of Welsh-men in town for their team's match against France, enjoyed a fine breakfast featuring un-French delicacies such as crisp bacon, buttered toast and salsa... and I visited the Musee D'Orsay.
And, I freely confess, the Musee was the highlight of the weekend.
The D'Orsay is dedicated to art from the second half of the nineteenth- and the early decades of the twentieth century, and is housed in a former train-station. I arrived early, and went directly to the fifth floor galleries to see the most famous Impressionists: Monet, Manet, Whistler, Van Gogh, Toulouse-Lautrec, etc.(As will soon become apparent, despite having attended an Art History class in college, I have never studied Art History. For those who have, I beg your forgiveness, if for example, Van Gogh is not an Impressionist. And if he was, then hang around a bit, because I'm sure to make some egregious errors shortly.)
On my way in I had rented an audio-guide, and also purchased a museum catalog. Thus armed, I stumbled past various master-pieces, audio-guide pressed to one ear, struggling to open the catalog to the appropriate page with my free hand. My mind was everywhere but on the paintings, so after thirty-minutes, I stuffed the book in my pocket, and dispensed with the audio-guide unless I saw something especially curious or intriguing.
And I had a terrific time. To use some hi-falutin' words, I interacted with the art directly. If a piece caught my eye, I stood there, absorbing it, observing the emotions I felt, noticing my "impression" of each painting (get it? "Impressionism"? I didn't either.) .
A painting by Leon Frederic entitled Les Ages de L'Ouvrier (The Ages of The Workman) put me in mind of my kids' school in Seattle -- the chaos of small children, the parallel societies of kids and parents, the sense that 99% percent of the kids will grow up to be doctors/lawyers/indian chiefs, just like their parents.
A canvas by Cuno Amiet called Paysage de Niege (Landscape of Snow) made me think about the way it feels to go to work lately.
And many other paintings made me miss my wife in a very specific way.
And then there was this rather famous painting by Edouard Manet called Dejeuner sur l'herbe (Lunch on the grass).
Ok, so let's talk about this painting.
I recognized it immediately, and knowing that this is universally recognized as a masterpiece, I did my best to absorb and appreciate it. Yes, it's a bit weird -- the ladies are nude, the guys aren't; and what the heck are those hats the men are wearing? But ok, I'm absorbing, I'm absorbing, I'm open to art, I'm open...
Step two: listen to the audio guide. The narrator explained that this painting caused a tremendous scandal when it was first shown, what with the ladies being nude and the guys wearing weird hats; then the guide described how Manet's technique was a departure, especially in his lack of attention to perspective -- the lady in the background doesn't look like she's in the background.
Ok, I'm absorbing... I'm noticing...
Yeah... nothin'... sorry, I'm not getting it.
The one lady is looking right at me -- that's pretty amazing -- as if she's inviting... no, daring me to join the group (sorry, left my funky hat in the car). But the guy on her left -- what's he looking at? Why is the guy on the right holding his hand that way?
Weird.
Ok, Next picture. Let's find another one that reminds me of Ceil.
As luck would have it, one of the books I picked up at the English-language bookstore tells "the rest of the story" about Dejeuner sur l'herbe. Here's what I learned:
Manet created this painting specifically to provoke the art "establishment" of his day which disdained any canvas not depicting a scene from antiquity, or illustrating a scene from the Bible. While nudes were a common subject for painters, they were idealized visions of loveliness and feminine proportion -- devoid erotic overtones and/or love-handles.
As for the strange pose -- turns out Manet purposefully cribbed that from a famous etching the "cognoscenti" would surely recognize.
This painting was a thoughtfully conceived thumb in the eye of the authorities -- Manet took something they revered (reproducing figures from a well-known classic) but juxtaposed it with things they'd find scandalous (a realistic depiction of a nude woman, men dressed in modern clothing) and painted in a style that would offend them (little attention to gradients of color, little care for perspective, no effort to hide or obscure brush-strokes).
Ok, so now I love this painting. Sticking it to the man! Yeah, baby! Go Edouard! Go Edouard! That'll show 'em!
So here's my question, though, to those of you who paid attention during Introduction to Art History: am I supposed to know all this stuff before I see the painting? And if so, what about the thousands of other paintings I haven't (and won't ever) read about... can I ever truly understand and appreciate those paintings simply by standing in front of them?
In the end, I guess, the paintings I saw that day "worked": I was moved -- I felt wistful, I felt heroic, I felt humble, I felt very, very horny. Maybe that's enough. But after reading up on Dejeuner sur l'herbe I'm beginning to think that an audio guide and a catalog aren't nearly enough preparation for visiting Musee D'Orsay.
Peace.



Or, more disturbingly, war deaths in 2002:

























